Quick answer: this page used to rank Pattaya’s zones by gross yield and set the result against Phuket. Both sides of that comparison have been withdrawn, because neither was measured. Compare: Pattaya investment guide, Pattaya vs Phuket comparison, Phuket rental yield guide, best Thai rental demand, real income potential Phuket.
What this page can no longer claim
A table sat here giving six Pattaya zones a price per square metre, an entry price and a gross yield band, Pratumnak at 10-13%, Wongamat 9-12%, Jomtien 8-11%, and so on. A second table set those against Phuket, with vacancy rates, risk-adjusted net yields and annual appreciation for each. Every number in both tables is withdrawn.
Two separate reasons, and they compound.
Thailand keeps no letting register. There is no central record anywhere in the country of what a privately owned unit was let for, for how many nights, at what rate. No occupancy series is published for Pattaya, and none for Phuket either. So no Thai rental yield has been measured by anyone, and a comparison of two unmeasured numbers tells you nothing about either.
Pattaya is not on our records. MORE Group’s price file covers Phuket: 299 schemes, 14,322 priced units, across beach labels from Bang Tao to Pa Khlok. There is no Pattaya scheme in it. So the price per square metre and the entry prices in the old table did not come from a price list we hold: they were market impressions typed into a grid.
That second point matters more than it looks. In the Phuket comparisons on this site, at least one side of the pair rests on a real price list. Here neither does.
What remains true, and where it comes from
The statute
The legal position is identical in Pattaya, Phuket and Bangkok, and it is written down.
Non-Thai nationals may hold freehold title in a registered condominium only within the 49% foreign quota, measured by total floor area of the building, not by unit count, under the Condominium Act B.E. 2522 (1979). The remaining 51% must be Thai-owned. Where the foreign quota is exhausted, buyers use a registered leasehold, often structured as 30+30+30 years, or buy an existing foreign-quota unit on resale.
Foreigners cannot hold freehold land, so villas and houses come as leasehold or through a company structure that needs proper legal review. Freehold condominium transfers to non-residents normally require proof of inward foreign currency remittance (the FET form) for registration at the Land Department.
None of that is market opinion. It is the same in both cities and it is the part of the old page that survives intact.
The quota check that actually bites
Heavy marketing to one nationality can exhaust the foreign quota on a building’s small units while the larger ones remain Thai-eligible. The consequence is specific: you can be sold on a studio in a tower whose studio quota is already gone. Ask for written confirmation naming your unit and its floor area in square metres before you reserve, in either city. This is a document, not an estimate, and a seller who cannot produce it has told you something.
Comparing Pattaya with Phuket for your yield goals?
We can show you the Phuket price list and what it does not cover. Ask for the side-by-side.
Where Phuket sits, from the records
One side of this comparison does have a price list, so here it is. These are asking prices, not achieved sale prices, and medians are upper-middle across priced units. The unit counts matter as much as the medians: they say how much there actually is to choose from.
| Phuket area | 1BR units | 1BR median (THB) | 1BR from | THB per sqm | Median sqm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bang Tao | 2,914 | 5,930,000 | 1,800,000 | 155,400 | 39 |
| Layan | 786 | 7,919,910 | 3,830,800 | 144,302 | 54 |
| Kata | 702 | 5,587,000 | 3,650,000 | 154,792 | 38 |
| Rawai | 627 | 6,652,800 | 3,625,000 | 144,000 | 46 |
| Kamala | 385 | 7,074,432 | 4,248,640 | 156,140 | 46 |
| Wichit | 341 | 3,380,000 | 2,490,000 | 112,143 | 31 |
| Chalong | 234 | 2,759,400 | 2,671,200 | 98,550 | 28 |
| Karon | 248 | 8,930,000 | 4,500,000 | 194,894 | 47 |
| Kathu | 193 | 3,160,000 | 2,435,000 | 108,214 | 28 |
| Patong | 149 | 11,880,000 | 7,350,000 | 231,864 | 54 |
The old page’s premise was that Pattaya is where the cheap entry lives and Phuket is where you pay up. On our own records Phuket’s inland labels start below 2,500,000 THB, Kathu from 2,435,000 and Wichit from 2,490,000, both at roughly half Bang Tao’s metre, so the cheap-entry half of the comparison was never as clean as the table made it look. Whether Pattaya undercuts those is not something we can show you, because we do not hold the file.
The part of the old page that was never about numbers
Strip the invented percentages out and an argument remains that we still think is right, because it rests on structure rather than measurement.
Operator quality carries more of the outcome in a fragmented management market. Phuket’s short-stay demand runs largely through international leisure travellers booking on the major platforms: a pattern professional managers understand and can price against. Pattaya’s demand is a blend of long-stay winter guests, domestic weekend traffic from Bangkok, mid-term rentals tied to Eastern Economic Corridor employment, and a shorter-stay segment concentrated in the central zones. Each books differently and prices differently, and a manager who is good at one is not automatically good at another.
Passive ownership is the failure mode. Repricing has to be active, listings have to be maintained, and someone has to be accountable for the property in a way you can check. If you cannot name that person before you buy, whatever income a projection shows is not available to you. That was true when this page attached percentages to it and it is true without them.
Proximity to Bangkok is a structural difference, not a yield claim. Pattaya draws weekend and mid-week traffic from a metropolitan population an island market cannot reach by road. U-Tapao airport and the Eastern Economic Corridor sit behind that. What any of it is worth in occupancy or rate is the part nobody measures, but the road exists and the island does not have one.
Supply depth cuts both ways. A large existing rental stock means comparables are easy to find before you buy, and it means your unit competes with many near-identical units on price. Those are the same fact seen from entry and from exit.
Red flags and what to check before a Pattaya reservation
The legal framework is the same as Phuket’s, so the risks are market and operator risks rather than title risks. Each row below is a document or an observation, not a projection.
| What to check | Why it matters | What a clean answer looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Twelve months of month-by-month owner statements | This is the only evidence of income that exists anywhere in Thailand | Statements for two comparable units in the same building, deductions itemised |
| The operator’s platform review history | Review score is the primary filter most guests apply before booking | A live listing with a long review history, not a new page with a handful of reviews |
| Building age and what is completing nearby | New completions in the same zone compete directly with yours | A building already operating, with the local pipeline checked |
| Whether the management contract locks fees and channels | Fees that float after completion move the whole cost side | Fees and distribution fixed in writing for a stated term |
| Foreign quota on your specific floor plan | Quota is by floor area, and can be exhausted on one unit type | Written confirmation naming the unit, in square metres |
| Guarantee and revenue-share clauses | These are contract terms, and contract terms are checkable | The clauses read line by line, not summarised from a sales deck |
| Your own presence | An absent owner in a fragmented management market has no fallback | Visits before reservation, and a named person on the ground |
The one recommendation we will still make: if you will not go to Pattaya before reserving, buy where the management infrastructure carries an absent owner further. That is the clearest pattern in our own post-mortems, and it is a statement about how much local knowledge each market demands, not about which market pays more. We do not know which market pays more, and neither does anyone else.
What a foreign buyer owns, in either city
The ownership question is settled identically in Pattaya and Phuket, and it is worth spelling out because it is the part of the comparison that does not depend on anybody’s estimate.
Condominium freehold, within the quota. A non-Thai national can hold a registered condominium unit in freehold, in their own name, on the building’s title. That gets you the unit, an undivided share of the common property, a vote in the juristic person, and the right to sell to any qualified buyer. It does not get you the land beneath the building, any residence right or visa, and (for most non-residents) access to Thai mortgage finance, so the great majority of foreign purchases in both cities are cash or funded from abroad.
The cap is measured by floor area. Foreign freehold is limited to 49% of the building’s total floor area, with 51% held by Thai owners. Because it is area rather than unit count, a building can look half empty and still be out of foreign capacity, if the larger units went to foreign buyers. Capacity is consumed at registration, not at reservation, which matters most on an off-plan purchase completing two or three years after the deposit: a unit that is quota-available when you pay can be unavailable when you transfer.
Where the quota is exhausted, the alternatives are a registered lease, usually structured as thirty years with contractual promises of renewal, or a resale unit that already sits on the foreign side of the register. Both are workable and neither is the same asset. A lease is capped at thirty years per registration, and the arrangements marketed as 30+30+30 are one registered term plus two promises enforceable against a named counterparty rather than registered as rights in the land. That distinction is invisible for two decades and decisive afterwards.
Land is closed. Foreigners cannot hold freehold land in Thailand, in either city, so a house or villa comes as a registered lease or through a company structure that needs genuine legal review rather than a form filled in by the seller’s lawyer.
Transferring the money has a form attached. Freehold condominium transfers to non-residents normally require evidence of inward foreign currency remittance (the FET form) for registration at the Land Department. Arrange the remittance so the paperwork matches the buyer’s name on the contract; fixing a mismatch afterwards is slow.
None of that varies between Pattaya and Phuket, which is why the two cities cannot be separated on legal risk. They differ on market structure and on what evidence each can show you, and that is where the comparison actually lives.
Buyer scenarios and decision framework
Three profiles arrive at this comparison, and the right answer differs by profile rather than by market. None of them needs a yield figure to decide, which is the point.
Scenario A: the buyer who will be there. You intend to spend real time in Thailand, you will visit the building more than once before reserving, and you can name the person who will be accountable for the property when you are not in it. This profile can carry a fragmented management market, because you are the fallback. Both cities are open to you, and the decision comes down to what you want to look at in the morning and what you want to be within driving distance of. Decide on the property, then on the operator, then on the paperwork.
Scenario B: the buyer who will never come. You want a Thai asset managed entirely by someone else, with statements arriving and nothing else required of you. The variable that decides your outcome is the depth of the management market, because you have no fallback if the first operator disappoints. Buy where you have the most credible operators to choose between and the easiest time replacing one. Ask, before reserving, how many managers actively run units in the specific building; if the answer is one, you have a single point of failure and no leverage over its fees.
Scenario C: the buyer whose exit matters. You expect to sell within a defined window rather than hold indefinitely. Here the question is not income at all: it is how many buyers exist for your unit when you want out, and how quickly comparable units in the same building have changed hands. Ask the juristic person or the building’s own agents how many units sold in the last twelve months and at what asking prices. That is a checkable answer in either city, and it tells you more about your exit than any yield band would.
The framework, in four steps
1. Establish which side of the comparison has a price list. Ask each agent for their current inventory with asking prices, unit sizes in square metres and delivery dates. A market you can only discuss in ranges is a market you cannot price. We publish the Phuket file above; ask a Pattaya agent for theirs and compare the two documents rather than two impressions.
2. Fix the cost side before you discuss income. The operator’s share of gross, the common area rate per square metre, the sinking fund contribution and the statutory transfer taxes are all quotable in writing, in both cities, before you commit to anything. Get them in writing. This alone rules out a surprising share of purchases.
3. Demand the income evidence rather than an income projection. Twelve months of month-by-month statements from a comparable unit, deductions itemised. If none exists, because the building is new, or because the manager will not share, then income is unknown for your purchase, and that has to be stated in your own model rather than filled in with a band.
4. Settle the legal position on your specific unit. Written confirmation of the foreign quota position naming your unit and its floor area, the title type, and whether the building permits letting for stays under 30 days, which engages the Hotel Act licensing regime. These are documents, not opinions, and a seller who cannot produce them has answered the question.
A buyer who completes all four has a real basis for a decision in either city. A buyer who skips to step three’s projection has the thing this page just spent two thousand words withdrawing.
What we do when someone asks us to compare the two
We show what each side can evidence. For Phuket that is the price list above, the delivery status of each scheme, the payment schedule, and the operator’s fee written into the management agreement, customarily 20 to 30% of gross for nightly letting, but treat any range as assumed until it is quoted to you in writing. For Pattaya it is the statute, the building’s own paperwork and whatever statements an operator will produce.
What we will not do is put a percentage on either side and call the difference an analysis. Headline gross was never the decision variable; it was not a variable at all, because nothing measured it.
Compare the framing on the Phuket side: Phuket condos and rental income, and the method for building an income figure from statements rather than from a band: Phuket rental yield guide.
Frequently Asked Questions
No figure can be sourced, and the bands this answer used to give for Pratumnak, Wongamat, Jomtien and central Pattaya are withdrawn. Thailand keeps no letting register, so no Thai rental yield has been measured anywhere in the country, and Pattaya is not on MORE Group's price records either, we hold Phuket only. The income question is answered by twelve months of month-by-month owner statements from a comparable unit in the building you are looking at, with deductions itemised, or it is not answered.
The legal framework is not the risk, and it is identical to Phuket's. Condominium units carry Chanote title and the Condominium Act B.E. 2522 (1979) applies, with foreign freehold limited to 49% of the building's total floor area. What differs between the two cities is market structure and management depth, and this page no longer quantifies either, because nobody has measured them.
This page used to rank the zones by yield band. That ranking is withdrawn: there is no measured yield for any Thai zone, and we hold no Pattaya price list to rank them on price instead. What can be checked in any zone is the same list, the operator's twelve-month statements on comparable units, the review history of their live listings, what is completing nearby, and whether the management contract fixes fees and distribution channels for a stated term.
It cannot be compared on yield, in either direction, because neither number exists. Both cities sit in a country with no letting register. What can be compared is price where a price list exists: on our Phuket records the 1BR median runs from 2,759,400 THB in Chalong and 3,160,000 in Kathu up to 11,880,000 in Patong, with Bang Tao at 5,930,000 across 2,914 units. There is no equivalent file for Pattaya on our side, so we do not publish one.
The entry figures this answer used to give are withdrawn, they were market impressions, not a price list, and we hold no Pattaya inventory. For the Phuket side the entry is on the record: 1BR asking prices start at 2,435,000 THB in Kathu, 2,490,000 in Wichit and 2,671,200 in Chalong, and 1,800,000 at the very bottom of Bang Tao's tail. Ask any Pattaya agent for their own current price list and compare like for like.
Yes, on the same terms as anywhere in Thailand. Condominium units are available on freehold title to foreigners under the Condominium Act B.E. 2522 (1979), within the 49% foreign quota measured by the building's total floor area rather than by unit count. Land cannot be held freehold by a foreigner, so villas come as registered leasehold or through a company structure that needs legal review. Freehold transfers to non-residents normally require the FET form evidencing inward foreign currency remittance.
Olga
Head of Rentals, MORE Group
Runs the rental side at MORE Group: occupancy and rate data from managed Phuket units, management-company selection, and what an owner actually nets after costs.
About MORE Group →Get a Net Yield Calculation for Phuket Projects
Share your budget and preferred area. We will compare live projects using rent, fees and occupancy assumptions.
