Yield Comparison: Why Net Matters
Why Phuket Yields Are Higher
Tourist volume and diversity: Phuket’s airport was built for 12.5 million passengers a year and carried more than 17 million in 2024; Airports of Thailand is now enlarging it towards 30 million by 2028 (see the airport expansion note). That traffic arrives from Europe, the Gulf, Australia and East Asia at the same time, which is a wider spread of source markets than a European coast of similar size draws, and it is what keeps short-stay demand running through most of the calendar rather than one summer.
Short-stay regulation, stated correctly: Spain regulates short lets through regional tourist licences, with new licences capped or suspended in several regions, and Portugal through Alojamento Local registration, constrained in the cities and not always transferable on resale. Thailand regulates short stays too, differently: letting for under 30 days is hotel business under the Hotel Act and needs a licence held at the premises. The professional route in Phuket is therefore a building or operator that holds the licence, and an owner should check it before assuming nightly rates. What Phuket does not have is a city-by-city moratorium on new registrations.
Professional management infrastructure: Phuket’s hotel-affiliated management programmes operate at scale, multiple operators managing hundreds of units simultaneously, with global booking infrastructure that European boutique operators cannot access. The scale is what makes remote ownership workable. What it does to net yield depends on the operator’s fee and the building’s occupancy, which is why the audited statement, not the brochure, is the document to read.
Entry price: across the 123 priced condominium projects in our catalogue, the median developer entry price in the Q3 2026 market report was 4,934,800 THB, and at that level the unit comes with a pool, a gym and, in the managed buildings, a rental operator already in place. We do not track European asking prices and will not quote them. What a European buyer can check in an afternoon is what the same sum buys on their own coast and whether it comes with management attached.
Price Per Square Metre: Phuket Is Not Expensive
A table used to sit here comparing asking prices per square metre in Lagos, Marbella, Nice and Lisbon with Bang Tao. Nobody on this project monitors those four markets and the figures could not be traced to a source, so they have been withdrawn rather than left to look authoritative.
What can be stated is the Phuket side. The Q3 2026 report puts the median condominium entry at 4,934,800 THB and the median villa entry at 26,911,000 THB across 285 verified projects. For a per-square-metre figure, take the asking price of a specific unit from the listings and divide by its registered floor area, then set it against a specific unit on the coast you know. A market average against a market average says very little, because the Phuket figure usually includes a hotel-standard management package and the European one usually does not.
Ownership Rights: What EU Buyers Need to Know
EU Markets (Portugal, Spain, France, Italy)
- Full freehold ownership with no foreign buyer restrictions
- EU legal framework, court decisions enforceable across EU member states
- Inheritance law familiar and well-defined
- Mortgage financing readily available from domestic banks
Phuket (Thailand)
- Foreign freehold condo ownership under the Thai Condominium Act (49% quota)
- Chanote title, highest form of Thai title, registered with the Land Department
- 40+ year track record of foreign condo ownership without government interference
- Inheritance of Thai property through Thai courts, requires Thai will or international probate process
- Financing from Thai banks limited for foreigners, most foreign buyers purchase cash
The honest comparison: EU ownership is simpler and more fully protected under a supranational legal framework. Thai freehold condo ownership is genuinely secure, 40 years of precedent and institutional support confirm this, but requires understanding a different legal system and using specialist legal advice.
For European buyers the practical question is whether the income advantage justifies the legal complexity of operating outside EU frameworks. For most buyers who engage competent local legal advice, the answer is yes.
Tax Comparison for European Buyers
| Tax | Phuket (Thailand) | Portugal | Spain |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rental income tax, local | 15% withheld at source for an owner in Thailand under 180 days a year; residents on the progressive scale with a 30% flat deduction | 28% flat for a non-resident | Non-resident income tax at a flat rate that differs for EU/EEA residents and others, charged on imputed income when the property is not let |
| Tax on the gain, local | Seller’s withholding at the Land Department on the appraised value, plus specific business tax of 3.3% inside five years of purchase or stamp duty of 0.5% after | Taxed; the share of the gain brought into charge for a non-resident changed after EU-law litigation, so take the computation from a Portuguese adviser | Taxed, with a retention withheld from the price at completion |
| Annual property tax | Land and building tax at 0.02% of assessed value for a residential unit under 50 million THB: 7,000,000 THB assessed, 1,400 THB a year | IMI on the tax rateable value at a municipal rate within 0.3% to 0.45% for urban property | IBI on cadastral value at a municipal rate |
| Relief at home for local tax | Under the bilateral treaty between Thailand and your country of residence, if there is one | Portuguese domestic rules and treaties | Spanish domestic rules and treaties |
For an owner who spends fewer than 180 days a year in Thailand, the 15% withheld at source is generally the end of the Thai side: no Thai return, and the net income arrives with the tax already taken (the rental income tax guide covers the resident scale). Whether the home country adds to it depends on the treaty between Thailand and that country. There is no EU-wide agreement; a German, a Swede and a Dutch owner each read a different treaty, and the method, exemption or credit, differs between them.
On a sale, Thailand collects at the Land Department rather than through a capital gains return: the seller’s withholding computed on the appraised value, plus specific business tax if the unit is sold within five years of purchase and stamp duty otherwise (the transfer fees guide has the schedule). The home country then taxes the gain on its own rules, usually with credit for the Thai withholding, and that second layer is where a European seller’s real capital gains bill sits.
Visa and Lifestyle Comparison
| Factor | Phuket | Algarve | Costa del Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right to live there as an EU citizen | No: ownership carries no residence right | Yes, by EU free movement | Yes, by EU free movement |
| Long-stay route tied to money rather than citizenship | LTR visa (10 years, qualifying categories) or the retirement visa; see the visa options guide | Residential property no longer qualifies for the Golden Visa since October 2023 | The Golden Visa property route ended on 3 April 2025 |
| Winter climate | Hot and dry, around 29°C | Mild, 15-20°C | Mild, 15-20°C |
| Flight from London | Long haul, around twelve hours | Short haul, around three hours | Short haul, around three hours |
| Healthcare | Good private hospitals | Good, EU standard | Good, EU standard |
The Algarve and Costa del Sol win clearly on flight proximity and on an EU citizen’s right to live there. Phuket wins on winter climate and on the length of the rental season. The distance, a long-haul flight against a short-haul one, is the most common practical objection from European buyers, and the most common reason buyers who visit Phuket and see the quality first-hand change their view.
Buyer scenarios: European profiles
Scenario A: German snowbird: a Rawai two-bedroom, owner use November to March, let April to October, with the German treatment of the rent (exempt, but counted when setting the rate on other income) checked before purchase. Pair the holiday home guide with the German buyers guide.
Scenario B: French family: a Kata two-bedroom within walking distance of school and hospital, access ahead of maximum nightly rate.
Scenario C: Nordic remote worker: a Destination Thailand Visa held on proof of funds rather than an employer test, plus a condo sized so that a krona or euro move against the baht is survivable; start with the visa options guide and the best areas guide.
What each market asks of you as an owner
The day-to-day experience of holding these two assets differs more than the financial comparison suggests, and it is worth weighing.
A southern European holiday property is close enough to check on. You can be there in a morning, you can meet the agent, you can supervise a repair, and if a tenant leaves a problem you can look at it yourself. The costs of that proximity are a shorter earning season and higher recurring taxation.
A Phuket property is managed by someone else, necessarily. You will not be flying eleven hours to meet a plumber, which means the management relationship is the asset almost as much as the unit is. That is why so much of the advice on this site concerns operators, audited statements and building governance rather than square metres: for a European owner those are the levers that actually exist.
Owners who are comfortable delegating do well in Phuket. Owners who want to be involved usually find they prefer something closer to home, whatever the yield comparison says. It is worth being honest with yourself about which you are before the purchase rather than after the first difficult year.
Ownership, stated plainly for a European reader
The structures are different enough that European assumptions do not transfer, and the differences are worth stating before any numbers.
In most of Europe you buy land and the building on it, freehold, with a registry entry in your name and no restriction based on nationality within the EU. In Thailand a foreigner can hold a condominium unit freehold, in their own name, on the building’s title, within a cap of 49% of the building measured by total floor area. That is a genuine title and it is not a lesser form of ownership. What it is not is land.
For anything with a garden, the routes are a lease on the title, registered for no more than 30 years at a time, or a Thai company with genuine Thai participation. A European buyer used to owning a house outright should understand that a Phuket villa is a term of years, and price it as one.
Two further points that European buyers routinely get wrong. Ownership confers no right to stay, so the visa question is entirely separate and unaffected by how much you spend. And the Land Department registers a foreign buyer’s freehold only against money that came in from abroad as foreign currency and was changed into baht by the receiving Thai bank, which means the transfer is arranged for the paperwork first and for the exchange rate second.
The comparison that actually matters
European buyers usually arrive with a yield figure and a price per square metre, and both are the wrong starting point.
The right one is what you want the property to do. A holiday home you will use six weeks a year in southern Europe, reachable on a two-hour flight, is doing something a Phuket condominium cannot do at any price, because you will not fly eleven hours six times a year. A rental asset generating income across most of the calendar is doing something a Mediterranean property cannot do, because its season is short and its costs are not.
Once that is settled, the numerical comparison becomes tractable. Compare annual net against annual net, in the same currency, after each market’s own costs and taxes, across enough years to absorb the entry and exit costs. Do that honestly and Phuket usually wins on income while southern Europe usually wins on usability for a European owner, which is roughly what you would expect and is a more useful conclusion than either market’s marketing.
What neither comparison should be built on is a Thai gross figure against a European net one. That single error accounts for most of the disappointment on both sides.
Pros and cons for a European buyer
In favour of Phuket. Registered condominium freehold in your own name, which several Mediterranean markets restrict or complicate for non-residents. Entry prices per square metre well below comparable coastal property in Spain, Portugal, France or Italy. Rental demand across most of the year rather than a summer concentrated into two months. Low recurring property taxation compared with a Spanish IBI or a French taxe foncière. And a deep, professional rental management industry, which makes remote ownership genuinely workable.
Against. No land ownership for foreigners under any structure, so anything with a garden is a registered lease. No residence right attached to ownership, where several European programmes offer one. Currency exposure in baht against euro or sterling earnings. A flight of eleven hours or more, which reduces most European owners to one or two visits a year. And a legal framework your existing advisers do not know, which means paying for Thai counsel rather than relying on a lawyer you already trust.
What is genuinely close. Transaction costs, which are broadly similar once Thai transfer fees are set against European notary and registration charges. And the quality of available stock, where modern Phuket product compares well with anything at the same price in southern Europe.
Red flags for European buyers specifically
| Red flag | What it usually means | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Thai gross compared with a European net | The comparison is doing the work, not the market | Both figures after their own market’s costs and tax |
| ”Freehold” used for a villa | Foreigners cannot hold land in Thailand | Whether it is a registered lease or a company |
| Residency implied by ownership | No such link exists in Thailand | The visa route separately, with a professional |
| Rates quoted only in euro | Currency movement is hidden inside the figure | The baht return, stated separately |
| A single visit in high season | You have seen a quarter of the year | Time here in the wet season before committing |
| Home tax treatment unexamined | Some European systems tax this heavily | Your own country’s rules before completion |
Closing comparison: European vs Phuket 2026
Southern Europe’s friction sits at the front of the purchase: notary chains, transfer taxes, VAT on new build, and the licence a short let now needs in much of Spain and Portugal. Phuket’s friction is in the order of the paperwork: foreign quota confirmed in writing, money arriving as foreign currency in the buyer’s name, then the Land Department. A European seller will usually owe home tax on the gain even after Thailand has withheld at the transfer, so the Thai receipts are kept for as long as the home country can ask for them. An owner who needs to be in the flat every month should buy in Europe; an owner who wants the property to earn while they are elsewhere is the Phuket case.
| Decision factor | Lean Phuket | Lean EU resort |
|---|---|---|
| Entry ticket | Lower | Higher |
| Rental season | Most of the year | Concentrated in summer |
| Owner visits a year | One or two | As many as the flight allows |
| Residency link | None | Sometimes |
Looking for the right property in Phuket?
Our experts send a shortlist within 2 hours. 0% buyer commission.
Frequently Asked Questions
Three drivers come up in almost every conversation: a rental season that runs through most of the year rather than a summer, condominium freehold registered in the buyer's own name under a law that has worked the same way since 1979, and recurring property tax that is small next to a Spanish IBI or a Portuguese IMI. Against them stand distance, a legal system the buyer's own advisers do not know, and baht exposure. Whether the income advantage outweighs the rest depends on what the property is for, which is the comparison this page is built around.
We do not track Spanish asking prices and will not quote them. The Phuket side is measurable: the median developer entry price across the 123 priced condominium projects in our catalogue was 4,934,800 THB in the Q3 2026 report, and the cheapest entries sit well below that. The difference that matters more than the headline is the package: a managed Phuket building comes with a rental operator and hotel-standard facilities in the price, while a Costa del Sol resort apartment usually does not, so compare a specific unit against a specific unit, with management costs on both sides.
Yes, European nationals (and all foreign nationalities) can own condominium units on freehold title in Phuket under the Thai Condominium Act (49% foreign quota per building). The Chanote title deed provides registered, permanent ownership. European nationals do not receive any additional restrictions beyond the standard Thai foreign ownership framework. Unlike some markets that restrict specific nationalities, Thailand's Condominium Act is nationality-neutral within the foreign quota.
They no longer compete. Portugal's Golden Visa stopped accepting residential property as a qualifying investment in October 2023; other routes remain, but buying a flat is not one of them. Thailand's LTR visa is a 10-year visa for qualifying categories with asset and investment tests, and it confers no EU right of any kind. An EU citizen already has the right to live in Portugal by free movement. What they lack in Thailand is any residence right from ownership, which is why the Thai visa is a separate decision from the purchase, taken with a professional, whatever the property costs.
Nobody on this project monitors French prices, so this page gives no figure for Nice or Cannes; the Riviera is generally the most expensive of the coasts Europeans compare with Phuket, and that is as far as an honest statement goes. The useful comparison is not price per square metre but what each property earns after its own costs: a Riviera flat earns in a short season under French rules, a managed Phuket condominium earns across most of the year under Thai withholding, and both figures have to be net before they are set side by side.
Four, in the order they usually bite: a legal system your existing advisers do not know, which means paying for Thai counsel; distance, a long-haul flight that reduces most owners to one or two visits a year and makes the operator relationship the real asset; currency, baht income and a baht sale against a life priced in euros or sterling; and a knowledge gap, since checking a Thai developer, an operator and a building's governance is work a European purchase never required. All four are manageable with preparation, and none of them is removed by a higher yield figure.
Read Also:
- Thailand Property vs Other Investment Markets: Where Does Phuket Rank?
- Why Phuket Outperforms Most Resort Property Markets
- Thailand vs Bali Ownership Structures: What Foreign Buyers Need to Know
- Foreign Buyers in Phuket 2026: Market Share, Trends, and What It Means
- Best City in Thailand for Foreign Property Buyers 2026
Questions about this guide? Ask us on WhatsApp. The guide's title is already in the message, so you only need to write your question.
Ask on WhatsAppMaksim Shchegolev
Founder, MORE Group
Founder of MORE Group. Four years in investment banking before moving to Phuket, where he has worked in the local property market since 2018. Oversees developer relationships and every engagement above $300K.
About MORE Group →Get a Focused Phuket Property Shortlist
Share budget, area and goal. We will reply with suitable live projects, not a generic catalogue.